Advancing Urban Sustainability: Integrating Environmental, Social, and Economic Dimensions

doi.org/10.63339/FME20250901

Authors

  • Anil Kumar HRIT University, Ghaziabad, India Author

Keywords:

Urban sustainability, triple bottom line, green infrastructure, sustainable cities, governance

Abstract

Urban areas are the focus of the 21st-century sustainability development activities. The intensive urbanization and development ofcities, limited resources and the climate change have exacerbated the need to make cities more holistic concerning environmental safety, social inclusion and financial sustainability. The given paper dwells upon such concept as urban sustainability within theframework of the triple bottom line (TBL) model, the emphasis being on the interdependence of the ecological quality, social well-being, and economic activity. The paper is based on the Indian case studies such as the East Kolkata Wetlands and the green infrastructure plan in Pune, that provide a way through which cities can implement an integrated sustainability through policy, planning and governance innovations. It draws a conclusion with a recommendation of mixed-method approaches and methods of funding and indicators that need to be taken into consideration in response to Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 11) and Smart Cities Mission in India.

References

[1] UN-Habitat, World Cities Report 2020: The Value of Sustainable Urbanization. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Human Settlements Programme, 2020.

[2] J. Elkington, Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Stony Creek, CT, USA: New Society Publishers, 1998.

[3] X. Bai et al., "Defining and advancing a systems approach for sustainable cities," Nature Sustainability, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 101–110, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s41893-021-00713-9.

[4] N. Kabisch, N. Frantzeskaki, and D. Haase, "Nature-based solutions for urban resilience and sustainability: A review," Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 374–389, 2022, doi: 10.1038/s43017-022-00286-9.

[5] IPCC, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022.

[6] T. McPhearson et al., "Advancing urban ecology toward a science of cities," BioScience, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 198–212, 2016, doi: 10.1093/biosci/biw002.

[7] K. C. Seto, J. S. Golden, J. R. Albert, B. L. Turner II, and A. Reenberg, "Sustainability in an urbanizing planet," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 114, no. 34, pp. 8935–8938, 2017, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606037114.

[8] Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD), Smart Cities Mission: Statement and Guidelines. New Delhi, India: Government of India, 2015.

[9] Washington, DC, USA: World Bank Publications, 2021.

[10] S. Roy, S. Byahut, and S. V. Subramanian, "Green infrastructure in Indian cities: Policy evolution and implementation challenges," Urban Planning International, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 20–32, 2021.

[11] J. Ahern, "Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: The promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design," Landscape Ecology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1203–1212, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z.

[12] S. Bhattacharya, A. Ganguli, and A. Mukhopadhyay, "Biodiversity, traditional practices and sustainability issues of East Kolkata Wetlands: A Ramsar site of West Bengal, India," Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 190, no. 11, p. 659, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-7029-7.

[13] S. Chakraborty and A. Chatterjee, "Integrating wetland ecosystem services for urban resilience: A case of East Kolkata Wetlands, India," Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 263, p. 110398, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110398.

[14] Anguelovski, J. J. T. Connolly, M. Garcia-Lamarca, H. Cole, and A. L. Pearson, "New scholarly pathways on green gentrification: What does the urban ‘green turn’ mean and where is it going?," Progress in Human Geography, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1064–1086, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0309132518803799.

[15] J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.

[16] Pallathadka, J. Lau, and M. M. Rahman, "Urban sustainability indicators: Space, scale, stakeholders, and dimensions," Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 2105, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15032105.

[17] T. Elmqvist et al., "Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas," Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, vol. 14, pp. 101–108, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.001.

[18] E. Gomez-Baggethun and D. N. Barton, "Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning," Ecological Economics, vol. 86, pp. 235–245, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019.

[19] Ramaswami, A. G. Russell, P. J. Culligan, D. B. Hillis, and J. S. Harkness, "Meta-principles for developing smart, sustainable, and healthy cities," Science, vol. 352, no. 6288.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

Advancing Urban Sustainability: Integrating Environmental, Social, and Economic Dimensions: doi.org/10.63339/FME20250901. (2025). Frontiers of Multidisciplinary Exploration, 1(2), 20250901(1-6). https://fmejournal.co.in/index.php/fme/article/view/16