Designing Human-Centered Radiology Systems: A Product Design Framework for Patients

Authors

  • Ashish Kumar Singh Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University Delhi, Delhi, India Author
  • Nokil Singh Dr. B. R. Ambedkar University Delhi, Delhi, India Author
  • Monica Singh U. P. Institute of Design, Noida, AKTU Author
  • Ranganath M. Singari Singari Author

Keywords:

Radiology, Human-Centered Design, Product Design, Patient Experience, Service Design, Interaction Design, Social Design, Healthcare Innovation

Abstract

While radiology is a vital part of modern healthcare, patient experiences in radiology environments continue to be fraught with anxiety, communication barriers, lengthy wait times, and poor access. Although there has been great progress in diagnostic precision and efficiency through the use of technology, far less attention has been paid to the integration of human-centered design elements into radiology systems. This study suggests and validates a holistic human-centered product design framework for radiology services, consisting of four complementary dimensions: Medical Design, Interaction Design, Service Design and Social Design. A mixed methods research design was employed, which consisted of interviews with 20 patients and 10 radiology technicians, a survey of 100 patients, and a pilot study in a medium-sized urban hospital. Qualitative results showed that 65% of the patients felt a high level of pre-scan anxiety and 70% of the technicians reported usability and communication problems in the current systems. When asked quantitative answers, 72% of patients said they did not understand the explanations given during the procedure and 68% were not happy with the waiting time. The statistical analysis also showed a significant correlation between the quality of communication and the level of anxiety of the patients. Four interventions were developed and piloted based on these findings: the use of ergonomic equipment, the virtual reality orientation before a patient's procedure, the implementation of patient-friendly layered reporting systems, the use of digital workflow management tools and the adoption of inclusive multilingual communication strategies. Results from the pilot implementation showed a 35% decrease in anxiety for patients, a 42% increase in understanding of communication and a 28% increase in workflow efficiency. In addition, 80% of the families participating in the program had positive feedback from the child-friendly imaging environments created. The findings illustrate that the application of human centered product design approaches within radiology services can have a profound impact on wellness, trust, access and service performance for patients. The proposed framework provides a multidisciplinary approach that is scalable and patient-centric to make radiology a technology based discipline into a patient-centric healthcare ecosystem.

References

[1] M. A. Bruno, E. A. Walker, and H. H. Abujudeh, "Understanding and confronting our mistakes: The epidemiology of error in radiology and strategies for error reduction," Radiographics, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1668-1676, 2015, doi: 10.1148/rg.2015150023.

[2] G. Rego, A. Costa, and C. Vieira, "Patient-centered care and radiology: Exploring gaps and opportunities," Healthcare, vol. 10, no. 4, Art. no. 679, 2022, doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040679.

[3] L. F. Donnelly, J. M. Dickerson, M. A. Goodfriend, S. E. Muething, and M. Sherman, "Improving radiology patient experience," Radiographics, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1716-1729, 2018, doi: 10.1148/rg.2018180026.

[4] S. Sarangi and A. Batra, "Psychological implications of radiological procedures," Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 340-345, 2019, doi: 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_481_18.

[5] O. S. Pianykh, G. Langs, M. Dewey, et al., "Big data and AI in radiology: Opportunities and challenges," European Radiology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 89-97, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06246-0.

[6] C. I. Lee, "Engaging patients in radiology through effective communication," Academic Radiology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 323-325, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2016.12.009.

[7] D. J. Mollura, J. Mazal, K. L. Everton, et al., "Strengthening imaging services in low-resource settings," Journal of Global Radiology, vol. 6, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.7191/jgr.2020.1123.

[8] M. M. Rehani and D. P. Frush, "Challenges in global radiology," British Journal of Radiology, vol. 91, no. 1083, Art. no. 20170896, 2018, doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170896.

[9] F. Pesapane, M. Codari, and F. Sardanelli, "Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: Threat or opportunity?" European Radiology Experimental, vol. 2, no. 1, Art. no. 35, 2018, doi: 10.1186/s41747-018-0061-9.

[10] R. Agarwal, G. Gao, C. DesRoches, and A. K. Jha, "The digital transformation of healthcare: Current status and the road ahead," Information Systems Research, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 796-809, 2010, doi: 10.1287/isre.1100.0327.

[11] International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 9241-210: Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction - Human-Centred Design for Interactive Systems, 2019.

[12] R. Winton, A. Seibert, D. Seibert, and R. Wolf, "Patient-centered MRI environments: Reducing anxiety through environmental design," Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 391-398, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.03.006.

[13] Y. Hong, S. Jiang, Y. Zhou, and J. Tan, "Patient-centered radiology report: Toward enhancing patient experience and satisfaction," Journal of the American College of Radiology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 870-877, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.044.

[14] D. A. Norman, The Design of Everyday Things, revised and expanded ed. Basic Books, 2013.

[15] M. J. Bitner, A. L. Ostrom, and F. N. Morgan, "Service blueprinting: A practical technique for service innovation," California Management Review, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 66-94, 2008, doi: 10.2307/41166446.

[16] A. Cooper, R. Reimann, D. Cronin, and C. Noessel, About Face: The Essentials of Interaction Design, 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons, 2014.

[17] International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 62366-1: Medical Devices - Application of Usability Engineering to Medical Devices, 2015.

[18] S. Maffei, B. Villari, and F. Mazzarella, "Design for service innovation in healthcare," Design Issues, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 41-53, 2019, doi: 10.1162/desi_a_00545.

[19] A. L. Ostrom, A. Parasuraman, D. E. Bowen, L. Patricio, and C. A. Voss, "Service research priorities in a rapidly changing context," Journal of Service Research, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 127-159, 2015, doi: 10.1177/1094670515576315.

[20] A. Li, Z. Montaño, V. J. Chen, and J. I. Gold, "Virtual reality and pain management: Current trends and future directions," Pain Management, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 147-157, 2011, doi: 10.2217/pmt.10.15.

[21] J. Zhang, D. Furniss, A. Blandford, and A. Mayer, "Human factors in healthcare: Usability and safety of medical devices," Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 117, Art. no. 103768, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103768.

[22] J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark, Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed. Sage Publications, 2018.

[23] V. Braun and V. Clarke, "Using thematic analysis in psychology," Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77-101, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

[24] A. Field, Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics, 5th ed. Sage Publications, 2018.

[25] D. Gray, S. Brown, and J. Macanufo, Gamestorming: A Playbook for Innovators, Rulebreakers, and Changemakers. O'Reilly Media, 2010.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-02

How to Cite

Designing Human-Centered Radiology Systems: A Product Design Framework for Patients. (2026). Frontiers of Multidisciplinary Exploration, 2(2). https://fmejournal.co.in/index.php/fme/article/view/28

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.